<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authentication Servers, the Next Generation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/</link>
	<description>A partial repository of whatever comes to mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:51:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oes tsetnoc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-20894</link>
		<dc:creator>oes tsetnoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/#comment-20894</guid>
		<description>Fantastic, straight to the point and very usable ... wish all documentation was the same . ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic, straight to the point and very usable &#8230; wish all documentation was the same . <img src='http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Renfro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Renfro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>I agree that the netbios alias is about the only way to accomplish exactly what you&#039;re after.  In my case, none of our dual-boot systems offer print or file services to anyone -- all that is handled primarily by dedicated servers, and occasionally by systems that don&#039;t dual-boot. Long term, you may decide to do similarly -- you don&#039;t necessarily want to risk rebooting during someone&#039;s print job or other use of the SMB share.

EDIT: oh, and I guess I didn&#039;t explicitly mention that I use the above smb.conf exclusively on regular workstations that just need winbind and Active Directory authentication. The fileserver, webserver, etc. all get different configurations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the netbios alias is about the only way to accomplish exactly what you&#8217;re after.  In my case, none of our dual-boot systems offer print or file services to anyone &#8212; all that is handled primarily by dedicated servers, and occasionally by systems that don&#8217;t dual-boot. Long term, you may decide to do similarly &#8212; you don&#8217;t necessarily want to risk rebooting during someone&#8217;s print job or other use of the SMB share.</p>
<p>EDIT: oh, and I guess I didn&#8217;t explicitly mention that I use the above smb.conf exclusively on regular workstations that just need winbind and Active Directory authentication. The fileserver, webserver, etc. all get different configurations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Redditt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Redditt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>Attaching a prefix to the hostname (%h) avoids the Jekyll and Hyde issue of both installs trying to both join the domain using the same netbios name.

But consider my situation where a dual boot box (XP/Ubuntu) has a shared printer and shared drives.  I would like it so that other users on the network don&#039;t have to know what OS the dual boot box is currently running in order to access that machine&#039;s printer or shared drives.

I&#039;ve tried getting both to use the same machine account name, SID, and password, (using things like NETDOM.exe and &quot;net -f CHANGESECRETPW&quot; but so far not much luck.

I know it&#039;s possible for two different OS installs to share the same machine account, as M$ actually makes provisions for this, due to the necessity of disabling automatic machine acct password changes if it&#039;s going to work over time.

see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154501

But getting Linux and Windows to share, I don&#039;t know...

There may be an easier way, however, using netbios aliases instead of actually using the same machine account.  After all, I&#039;m mostly concerned with how things appear on the network than the actual accts.

see  http://www.hostingforum.ca/293959-re-samba-linux-active-directory-integration-problem.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attaching a prefix to the hostname (%h) avoids the Jekyll and Hyde issue of both installs trying to both join the domain using the same netbios name.</p>
<p>But consider my situation where a dual boot box (XP/Ubuntu) has a shared printer and shared drives.  I would like it so that other users on the network don&#8217;t have to know what OS the dual boot box is currently running in order to access that machine&#8217;s printer or shared drives.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried getting both to use the same machine account name, SID, and password, (using things like NETDOM.exe and &#8220;net -f CHANGESECRETPW&#8221; but so far not much luck.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s possible for two different OS installs to share the same machine account, as M$ actually makes provisions for this, due to the necessity of disabling automatic machine acct password changes if it&#8217;s going to work over time.</p>
<p>see <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154501" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154501</a></p>
<p>But getting Linux and Windows to share, I don&#8217;t know&#8230;</p>
<p>There may be an easier way, however, using netbios aliases instead of actually using the same machine account.  After all, I&#8217;m mostly concerned with how things appear on the network than the actual accts.</p>
<p>see  <a href="http://www.hostingforum.ca/293959-re-samba-linux-active-directory-integration-problem.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hostingforum.ca/293959-re-samba-linux-active-directory-integration-problem.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Holmwood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Holmwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Fantastic guide. It&#039;s great to see this sort of quality documentation for Puppet appearing. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic guide. It&#8217;s great to see this sort of quality documentation for Puppet appearing. <img src='http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Renfro&#8217;s Blog : Directory Servers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Renfro&#8217;s Blog : Directory Servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t use automount, and the vast majority of UID/GID mappings I already covered in the Authentication Servers post, though it may technically belong here. One other thing at the bottom of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t use automount, and the vast majority of UID/GID mappings I already covered in the Authentication Servers post, though it may technically belong here. One other thing at the bottom of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Renfro&#8217;s Blog : The New File Server: Puppet and Modules</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Renfro&#8217;s Blog : The New File Server: Puppet and Modules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cae.tntech.edu/mwr/2007/08/02/authentication-servers-the-next-generation/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] an entire followup artcle for my authentication notes, I&#8217;ll hold off on that part for now which can be found here. But the Amanda configuration code, that&#8217;s worth talking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an entire followup artcle for my authentication notes, I&#8217;ll hold off on that part for now which can be found here. But the Amanda configuration code, that&#8217;s worth talking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
